I am looking for an essay I read earlier this year. It described in lucid and exacting yet very simple language the necessity of an immenent danger and no other means of defense before allowing violence for the purpose of defending the innocent. It explained why prolife does not mean pro-death-for-abortionists.
I can’t find it. I have found these two documents that touch on the matter. If you can find more to help us all understand a valid reasoning to oppose violence then please do comment here or email me.
Faith Facts: the Answers you Need Capital Punishment http://www.cuf.org/faithfacts/details_view.asp?ffID=29
Can the Killing of Abortionist be Justified?
by Charles Rice
from The Wanderer, 9/1/94, p.6